People at the age of 21 are more mature than 16 class olds. They would take the whole voting member a lot more serious. The mastermind would be a lot more developed at the age of 21 rather than 16. Adults at the age of 21 would have a better view on voting. They pull up stakes understand how it will affect them in the everyday innovation.
Adults at 21 would have better attention to what is going on in their everyday life. Most people at the age of 16 do not know what they are going to do with their life. They do not know what is going on in their environment. Most adults help about voting when it comes to it affecting their lives (collage). Sixteen year olds are still sleeping in class and could care less about voting.
People at the age of 16 do not even have a job yet. If people do not have jobs, how would they have a good grip around what is taking place in the economy? The teens wouldnt know how to save their money. Which in the future, case in a poor life.
At the age of 21, adults wouldve interpreted business classes and learned more about the economy and the make up of saving money to get far in life.
In conclusion, the question whether or not to change the voting rectitude back to 21 (The 26th amendment of the constitution changed it to 18 in 1971); stands as a must. It will just provide a better future for our economy and would make a larger impact. Although, voting at the age of 16 would seem the likes of a better idea on a diachronic and cultural point of view. At the age of 21, the human brain has almost fully developed to where humans see the world in other peoples eyes. Im not saying 16 year olds already do not do that, I am stating that a lot more people could feel that way and act in a more mature manner to their environment. Thus concludes...If you ask to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment