Significant Concept: Bohannans article touches on a subject that is primal to cultural anthropology, namely, genius researcher taking advantage of appeared to be an opportunity to test her theory of comparative perspective bring egress in the African bush. Specifically, Bohannan wanted to read Shakespeare to the natives to ascertain whether the familiar speckle and motivation of the greater tragedies would always be clear. As the indigenous peoples reaction to Hamlet illustrates, this is not the case. Instead, the telling of the determinate story allows a glimpse at how easily one can allow ethnocentric views to enter into - if not out and out define - expectations about how a given bushel of people ought to react to a literary piece, work of art, or sample of music. The African tribal members interjected and provided commentary about the plot as it was being described by Bonhannan, asking questions and pursuit clarification about nuances that would likely escape the attention of a Western reader. Hamlet was a fool not to go to one skilled in reading omens and divining the truth in the first place, one tribal man offered up subsequently hearing of the first ghostly visit. He continued, [I]f there had been witchcraft in [Hamlets fathers death] then Hamlet could have called the elders to settle the numerate (49).
From this, one begins to understand how significant a part of a given culture norms and values are, and how they respectively provide an gene of necessary context for interpreting the actions of other people and delineate societal priorities in light of what Bailey & People oft refer to as the human variation between cultures. From the obviously universal notion of how people ought to act in a given to the symbols used in Shakespeares work, Bohannans article reinforces the key idea of...
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.
No comments:
Post a Comment